Product Metrics: What Each Function Should Track

Product teams are drowning in data. Every tool in the modern stack generates dashboards, every feature ships with event tracking, and every stakeholder has a favorite metric they want to see trending upward. Yet despite this abundance, most product teams struggle with a fundamental question: which metrics should each function actually own and act on? The result is either everyone tracking everything (and nobody acting on anything) or each function operating with metrics that do not connect to the broader product story.

The solution is not fewer metrics or more metrics. It is the right metrics for each function, connected through a shared understanding of how they ladder up to product and business outcomes.

Why Metrics Matter

Metrics serve different purposes depending on how they are used. At their best, they are decision-making tools that help teams prioritize, evaluate, and iterate. At their worst, they become vanity numbers that teams optimize at the expense of actual user value. Understanding why metrics matter for each function is the first step toward building a healthy measurement culture.

• Metrics create accountability. When a team commits to moving a specific number, it focuses effort and creates clarity about what success looks like.
• Metrics enable learning. Without measurement, product development is guesswork. Metrics tell you whether your hypotheses were right and where to dig deeper.
• Metrics facilitate communication. A shared set of metrics gives the cross-functional team a common language for discussing progress, risks, and trade-offs.
• Metrics surface problems early. The right leading indicators warn you about issues before they become crises, whether it is a performance degradation or a drop in user engagement.
• Metrics align incentives. When PM, design, and engineering track complementary metrics, their daily decisions naturally reinforce each other rather than pulling in different directions.

The danger is treating metrics as scorecards rather than instruments. A scorecard tells you whether you won or lost. An instrument tells you how to fly the plane. Product teams need instruments.

For PMs: Business and Product Health Metrics

Product managers sit at the intersection of user value, business value, and technical feasibility. Their metrics should reflect this position by connecting user behavior to business outcomes and providing the context needed to make prioritization decisions.

Acquisition and Activation Metrics

The top of the funnel deserves PM attention because it determines the pool of users who will experience the product. PMs should track not just volume but quality of acquisition.

• Signup-to-activation rate. What percentage of new signups reach the “aha moment” where they experience core value? This is arguably the most important metric for any growing product. If activation is low, nothing else matters because users are leaving before they understand what the product does.
• Time to value. How long does it take a new user to achieve their first meaningful outcome? Shorter is almost always better. Track this by cohort and by acquisition channel to identify where the onboarding experience breaks down.
• Acquisition channel efficiency. Cost per acquired user by channel, combined with downstream retention data by channel. Cheap acquisition that churns is worse than expensive acquisition that retains.
• Feature adoption rate for new capabilities. When you ship something new, what percentage of the target audience uses it within the first 14 days? Low adoption of a well-promoted feature is a signal that the problem was not as important as hypothesized or the solution is not discoverable.

Retention and Engagement Metrics

Retention is the foundation of sustainable growth. PMs should understand not just whether users come back but why they come back and what predicts long-term retention.

• Cohort retention curves. Track week-over-week and month-over-month retention by signup cohort. Look for the flattening point where retention stabilizes, this tells you your natural retention baseline. Improving the slope of early retention is usually the highest-leverage work a product team can do.
• Core action frequency. Define the one or two actions that represent genuine product usage (not vanity actions like logging in) and track how often retained users perform them. For a project management tool, this might be “created or completed a task.” For a communication tool, it might be “sent a message.”
• Engagement depth. Beyond frequency, how deeply are users engaging? Are they using advanced features or only surface-level functionality? This metric helps PMs understand whether the product is becoming more valuable over time or remaining a shallow utility.
• Net revenue retention (for B2B). Among existing customers, is revenue growing through expansion or shrinking through contraction and churn? This metric captures whether your product is becoming more valuable to customers over time.

Business Outcome Metrics

PMs must connect product metrics to business metrics. This is what earns trust from leadership and ensures product work is aligned with company strategy.

• Revenue per user or account. Track this longitudinally to understand whether product improvements translate to business value.
• Customer lifetime value to acquisition cost ratio. The classic LTV:CAC ratio tells you whether your growth model is sustainable. A ratio below 3:1 usually signals trouble.
• Payback period. How long until a customer generates enough revenue to cover their acquisition cost? Shorter payback periods enable faster reinvestment in growth.

For Engineers: System Health and Technical Quality Metrics

Engineers are responsible for the technical foundation that enables product value. Their metrics should focus on system reliability, performance, and code quality, the things that determine whether the product can deliver on its promises at scale.

Performance Metrics

Performance is a product feature. Users do not distinguish between “the product is slow” and “the product is bad.” Engineering should own performance metrics and treat regressions as high-priority bugs.

• Page load time (P50, P75, P95). Track percentiles, not averages. Averages hide the experience of your worst-served users. The P95 tells you what 1 in 20 users experience, and that tail often includes your most important users on slower connections or older devices.
• API response time by endpoint. Monitor the latency of critical API endpoints independently. A fast average can mask a single slow endpoint that blocks a key user flow. Set alerting thresholds by endpoint importance, not uniformly.
• Time to interactive. For web applications, how long until the user can actually interact with the page? This matters more than raw load time because it measures the user’s perception of speed.
• Core Web Vitals. Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift. These are standardized metrics that capture real user experience and also affect search ranking. Track them in the field using real user monitoring, not just in lab conditions.

Reliability Metrics

Reliability is the foundation of user trust. A product that is fast but unreliable is worse than one that is slightly slower but always available.

• Uptime and availability. Track this as a percentage (99.9% means about 8.7 hours of downtime per year) and set SLOs (Service Level Objectives) that align with business requirements. Not every service needs five nines.
• Error rate by category. Distinguish between client errors (4xx) and server errors (5xx). A spike in 4xx errors might indicate a frontend bug or a confusing API. A spike in 5xx errors is a reliability problem that needs immediate attention.
• Mean time to detection and mean time to recovery. How quickly do you notice problems, and how quickly do you fix them? These operational metrics directly impact user experience during incidents.
• Deployment success rate. What percentage of deployments succeed without rollback? Low deployment success rates indicate problems with the testing pipeline or the deployment process itself.

Code Quality Metrics

Code quality metrics are leading indicators of future development velocity. Technical debt that is invisible today becomes the bottleneck that slows every feature next quarter.

• Test coverage for critical paths. Do not aim for 100% coverage everywhere. Instead, ensure critical user flows and complex business logic have thorough test coverage. Track coverage changes per pull request to prevent erosion.
• Build and CI pipeline duration. How long does it take to go from code commit to deployable artifact? Slow pipelines slow down feedback loops and encourage batching changes, which increases risk.
• Dependency freshness. How current are your dependencies? Outdated dependencies accumulate security vulnerabilities and compatibility issues. Track the number of dependencies more than one major version behind.
• Incidents per deploy. Correlate deployments with incidents to understand whether your release process is stable. A high ratio of incidents to deploys suggests the need for better testing, canary releases, or feature flags.

For Designers: Experience Quality and Usability Metrics

Designers are responsible for the quality of the user experience. Their metrics should capture how users feel about the product, how effectively they can accomplish their goals, and where the experience creates friction.

Usability Metrics

Usability is measurable, and designers should own these measurements rather than relying on intuition alone.

• Task success rate. For critical user flows, what percentage of users complete the task successfully? This is the most fundamental usability metric. Track it for key flows like onboarding, core feature usage, and checkout or conversion paths.
• Task completion time. How long does it take users to accomplish specific goals? This metric is most useful when tracked over time to measure the impact of design changes. A redesigned workflow should reduce completion time if it is genuinely simpler.
• Error rate in user flows. How often do users encounter errors, dead ends, or need to backtrack during critical flows? High error rates indicate confusing UI, poor affordances, or missing guidance.
• Navigation efficiency. How many clicks or steps does it take to reach key destinations? Compare actual user paths against the optimal path to identify where users get lost.

Satisfaction and Perception Metrics

Quantitative behavior metrics tell you what users do. Satisfaction metrics tell you how they feel about it. Both are necessary for a complete picture.

• System Usability Scale (SUS) score. A standardized 10-question survey that produces a score from 0 to 100. Scores above 68 are considered above average. Run SUS surveys quarterly to track experience quality over time. The power of SUS is its standardization, which allows benchmarking against industry norms.
• Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) for specific flows. Deploy targeted CSAT surveys after key interactions. “How easy was it to [specific task]?” is more actionable than a generic satisfaction question because it ties sentiment to a specific experience.
• Qualitative feedback themes. Categorize and track themes from user interviews, support tickets, and feedback forms. The most common themes indicate the biggest experience gaps. Track theme frequency over time to measure whether design changes are resolving the issues users care about most.

Design System Metrics

For teams with a design system, tracking its health and adoption is a design responsibility that also affects engineering productivity.

• Component coverage. What percentage of the UI is built using design system components versus custom implementations? Higher coverage means more consistency and faster development.
• Design system adoption rate. When new components are released, how quickly are they adopted across the product? Low adoption may indicate that the components do not meet real needs or that the documentation is insufficient.
• Visual consistency score. Audit key screens periodically for adherence to design tokens (spacing, color, typography). Drift from the design system creates a fragmented experience.

Cross-Functional Metrics: The Shared Dashboard

While each function owns specific metrics, the most important metrics are the ones the entire team shares. These cross-functional metrics create alignment and ensure that functional metrics do not optimize in isolation.

The North Star Metric

Every product team should agree on a single North Star Metric that captures the core value the product delivers to users. This metric should be:

• A measure of user value, not revenue. Revenue is an outcome of delivering value, not the value itself.
• Leading, not lagging. It should predict future business success, not just report past results.
• Actionable by the product team. The team should be able to influence it through their work.

For example, a project management tool’s North Star might be “weekly active projects with at least three collaborators.” This captures that users are actively getting value from the collaboration features that differentiate the product.

Input Metrics That Each Function Influences

Decompose the North Star into input metrics that each function can directly impact:

• PM input: Feature adoption rates, activation conversion, experiment win rates. PMs influence the North Star by identifying the right problems to solve and ensuring solutions reach users.
• Engineering input: Performance scores, deployment frequency, system reliability. Engineers influence the North Star by ensuring the product works well technically, because slow or unreliable products lose users regardless of feature quality.
• Design input: Task success rates, usability scores, onboarding completion. Designers influence the North Star by ensuring users can discover and effectively use the features that deliver value.

Metrics Review Cadence

Establish a regular cadence for reviewing metrics as a cross-functional team:

• Weekly: Review operational metrics (performance, error rates, engagement trends). Flag anything unexpected for investigation.
• Bi-weekly or sprint-end: Review feature-level metrics for recently shipped work. Did the feature achieve its success criteria? What did you learn?
• Monthly: Review product health metrics (retention curves, satisfaction scores, business metrics). Identify trends and adjust priorities.
• Quarterly: Review strategic metrics (North Star progress, OKR attainment, competitive position). Inform roadmap planning with data.

Avoiding Metrics Pitfalls

Cross-functional teams should be vigilant about common metrics traps:

• Goodhart’s Law. When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. If you incentivize a specific metric too aggressively, teams will find ways to game it. Pair target metrics with guardrail metrics to detect gaming.
• Vanity metrics. Total registered users, page views, and app downloads feel good but rarely drive decisions. Focus on metrics that inform action.
• Analysis paralysis. Having too many metrics is as bad as having too few. Each function should own three to five key metrics, not thirty.
• Attribution obsession. Do not waste time arguing about which function “caused” a metric to move. Product outcomes are the result of cross-functional collaboration. Celebrate team wins, not functional wins.

Key Takeaways

• PMs: Own acquisition, activation, retention, and business outcome metrics. Your metrics should connect user behavior to business value and guide prioritization decisions. Define success criteria for every feature using leading indicators, lagging indicators, and guardrail metrics.
• Engineers: Own performance, reliability, and code quality metrics. Treat performance as a product feature and reliability as a baseline requirement. Track leading indicators of technical debt to prevent future velocity problems. Share system health dashboards with the broader team.
• Designers: Own usability, satisfaction, and design system health metrics. Measure task success rates and completion times for critical flows. Use standardized surveys like SUS for longitudinal tracking. Ensure design system adoption is growing to maintain consistency and development speed.

The goal is not to drown in data but to give each function a clear set of instruments that guide daily decisions while maintaining a shared view of product health that keeps the team aligned. The best metrics cultures treat measurement as a tool for learning, not a tool for judgment.

---

Which metric has been the most transformative for your product team, and how did it change the way you make decisions?